My Photo

My Articles


  • This site is intended purely as a resource guide for educational and informational purposes and is not intended to provide specific legal advice. This site should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a professional attorney in your state. The use and receipt of the information offered on this site is not intended to create, nor does it create, an attorney-client relationship.

    Please feel free to contact me via e-mail or otherwise. However, please be advised that an attorney-client relationship is not created through the act of sending electronic mail to me.

    The comments on this blog are solely the opinions of the individuals leaving them. In no way does Legal Antics or Nicole L. Black endorse, condone, agree with, sponsor, etc. these comments.

    Further, any information provided on this blog or in the comments should be taken at your own risk.

« I'll be in New York City on 10/8 | Main | Sometimes they're just clueless-you can't blame 'em for that. »

Oct 01, 2009


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Greg Lambert


Although you raise some good points here, I have to tell you that there is a small grain of truth in the criticism by the firms. I've seen many women and minorities jump over to the client side, not because the client is all about diversity, but rather because the work environment at corporations is seen as more palatable (read 9 to 5) than firms are. Many take salary cuts to go over to corporate.
Now the easy thing to say is that law firms need to copy the corporate environment and be a more 9 to 5 job. However, try to explain to your clients that their outside counsel is only available to them 9 to 5.
There are a number of issues that explain why firms lose out on the diversity issue. Saying that it is because corporation foster diversity more than firms do is oversimplifying the situation.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner