My Photo

My Articles


  • This site is intended purely as a resource guide for educational and informational purposes and is not intended to provide specific legal advice. This site should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a professional attorney in your state. The use and receipt of the information offered on this site is not intended to create, nor does it create, an attorney-client relationship.

    Please feel free to contact me via e-mail or otherwise. However, please be advised that an attorney-client relationship is not created through the act of sending electronic mail to me.

    The comments on this blog are solely the opinions of the individuals leaving them. In no way does Legal Antics or Nicole L. Black endorse, condone, agree with, sponsor, etc. these comments.

    Further, any information provided on this blog or in the comments should be taken at your own risk.

« Georgia Association for Women Lawyers Announces Study Results from IT'S ABOUT TIME II: Examining Flexible Work Arrangements | Main | Law Firms Opening Up to the Idea of Attorney Re-Entry »

Mar 05, 2008


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Marc J. Randazza

Nicole, very poor ethics in quoting me there. If you continued, you'd see that the paragraph continues:

I just don’t make value judgments about someone’s sexuality. If a woman or a man is promiscuous and they are happy — they can be a slut if they want, or not.

You'll also note that I said "women," not kindergarteners. Nevertheless, for the record... my girlfriend and I both giggle when we call each other "slut." I could (but wont) name at least a half a dozen female friends who use the term endearingly and humorously.

The point is, the word means what you want it to mean. If you want to give it such talismanic power, go ahead. But don't judge me (or anyone else) for not being so willing to give it that kind of power.

I can embrace your point, without agreeing with it, that I'm wrong about "slut" being a defamatory term. But your post is not really about the issue I discussed, is it?

If you are interested in promoting some kind of agenda, at least be ethical about it.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner