« The New York Legal News Round Up | Main | The New York Legal Blog Round Up »
July 06, 2008
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834516c2469e200e5538b69ec8833
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Define That Term #289:
Comments
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
The comments to this entry are closed.
About This Blog
Authored by Nicole
You can find me at:
Sui Generis Partner
Subscribe to this blog
lawtechtalk
Visit Our Sister Blogs
New York Law Blogs
- A Buffalo Lawyer
- Albany Lawyer
- Art Law
- Completely Legal
- Coverage Counsel
- Full Court Pass
- It's No-Fault of NY
- Juz The Fax
- Long Island Bankruptcy Attorneys Blog
- Mental Disability Law Blog
- New York Attorney Malpractice Blog
- New York Civil Law
- New York CLE
- New York Court Watcher
- New York Criminal Defense Blog
- New York Disability Law Blog
- New York Federal Criminal Practice
- New York Injury Cases Blog
- New York Law Blog
- New York Legal Update
- New York Personal Injury Law Blog
- New York Public Personnel Law
- No-Fault Paradise
- NYSBA--General Practice Section Blog
- Outside Counsel
- ReformNY
- Rochester Bankruptcy and Debt Relief
- Rochester Family Lawyer
- Second Opinions
- Simple Justice
- Spar &Bernstein’s Law Link
- The blog of Jeena R Belil PC
- The Elliot Schlissel New York Law Blog
- The Sienko Law Office Blog
- theCPLRblog
- Wait A Second!
Recent Posts
- When is social media contact criminal?
- Ethics of VLOs and advertising in New York
- Book Review: Paperno’s ‘Representing the Accused’ a step-by-step guide for criminal defense attorneys
- California lawyers can operate VLOs in the cloud
- Oregon weighs in on lawyers mining social media
- ABA on judges using social media during campaigns
- On the Boston Tragedy: And for what?
- ABA opines on judges using social media
- A Mobile Practice Management Infographic and a Giveaway!
- New Hampshire on the ethics of lawyers using cloud computing
Categories
- Books
- Civil Rights
- Cloud Computing
- Constitutional Issues
- Court of Claims
- Criminal Law
- Current Affairs
- Daily Record--Legal Currents Column
- Elder Law
- Employment Law
- ethics
- Evidentiary Issues
- Federal Decisions
- Federal Procedure
- Finding Balance
- First Department
- Fourth Department
- Funny stuff
- Humorous Tidbit
- Insurance Defense
- Labor Law
- Law & Technology
- Legal Definitions
- Legal Practice
- Legislative Issues
- life as a PD
- Medical Malpractice
- Misbehaving lawyers
- mobile computing
- New York Civil Procedure
- New York Legal Trivia
- News Item
- NY Blawg Round Up
- NY Court of Appeals
- NY Lawyer Advertising Rules
- NY Legal News Round Up
- NY Minute
- Other
- Personal Injury
- Politics
- Presentations
- Second Department
- social media
- Supreme Court
- TED Talks
- Third Department
- Travel
- Trusts and Estates
- Web resources
- Web/Tech
- Weblogs
disclaimer
- This site is intended purely as a resource guide for educational and informational purposes and is not intended to provide specific legal advice. This site should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a professional attorney in your state. The use and receipt of the information offered on this site is not intended to create, nor does it create, an attorney-client relationship.
Please feel free to contact me via e-mail or otherwise. However, please be advised that an attorney-client relationship is not created through the act of sending electronic mail to me.
The comments on this blog are solely the opinions of the individuals leaving them. In no way does Legal Antics or Nicole L. Black endorse, condone, agree with, sponsor, etc. these comments.
Further, any information provided on this blog or in the comments should be taken at your own risk.
Other State Blawgs
- A Georgia Lawyer
- Boston Immigration & Nationality Law
- Connecticut Medicaid and Estate Planning
- Georgia Wills and Probate Law Blog
- How Do You Like Them Appellates?
- Iowa Champion
- Joplin, MO Business Blog
- Massachusetts Corporate Law Notes
- Massachusetts Estate Planning Blog
- Missouri Family and Divorce Lawyer Blog
- New Jersey Insurance Litigation Blog
- Texas Criminal Defense Attorney
- Texas DWI Lawyer
- The Alablawg
- The Amateur Law Professor (Washington)
- The Texas Law
I'm no IP lawyer, so I'll agree the answer isn't obvious--but isn't nonobviousness the doctrine in patent law under which patent protection is available for a claim only if the so-called improvement is not "obvious" to an individual with knowledge of the state of the art to which the claim relates?
Obviously, given my lack of knowledge of the state of this art, I stand ready to be corrected.
Posted by: Edward Wiest | July 09, 2008 at 10:54 AM