« Define That Term #204 | Main | The Monday New York Blawg Round Up »

April 15, 2007

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834516c2469e200d834f727ae53ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference First Department Reverses Default Judgment:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Eddie

Given you are not lucky /unlucky enough to practice in NYC you wouldn't know anything about the trial judge involved in this case. I don't believe he had any bias against pltf's or this pltf atty but he did my opinion, have a bias in favor of the TA as he handled all their cases as his part was a dedicated TA part. This judge also was at the end of his time on the bench and, in my opinion, should have been removed even before that as he was clearly no longer mentally fit to sit on the bench. I could not believe some of the things I saw in his courtroom as he neared his Yet even now that he's been removed he's still around as they made him a JHO. God bless cronyism at its finest.

NBlack

I knew there was something strange about this one. Thanks for the additional information! It's nice to know that there's some sort of explanation for the unusual rulings below...

The comments to this entry are closed.

My Photo

About This Blog

Sui Generis Partner

Other Sui Generis Sponsors





Receive Updates Via Email

disclaimer

  • This site is intended purely as a resource guide for educational and informational purposes and is not intended to provide specific legal advice. This site should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a professional attorney in your state. The use and receipt of the information offered on this site is not intended to create, nor does it create, an attorney-client relationship.

    Please feel free to contact me via e-mail or otherwise. However, please be advised that an attorney-client relationship is not created through the act of sending electronic mail to me.

    The comments on this blog are solely the opinions of the individuals leaving them. In no way does Legal Antics or Nicole L. Black endorse, condone, agree with, sponsor, etc. these comments.

    Further, any information provided on this blog or in the comments should be taken at your own risk.