« Can It Really Be That Simple? | Main | New York Legal News Round Up »

April 24, 2007


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.


Boo-fucking-hoo, her name got released. So she's publicly recognized as a liar of the worst sort.

It's certainly not as bad as the punishment I would choose for her - throw her in jail.

The allegations she made are very serious and could have easily landed the accused in jail serving long terms; time and again, you read about men who serve long jail terms because someone cried "rape" - only for evidence to mount years later that the woman was *lying*.


Given that the Duke rape case is virtually a carbon copy of the Tawana Brawley case, Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson are doing a fine job of diverting attention away from this case with getting Imus fired.


Prosecutors and interrogators are legally permitted to lie and use lies in order to secure confessions from the confused / accused, true or false?

20 convictions have been overturned by DNA evidence, true or false?

When a domestic violence complaint is made, the male gender is the presumed guilty party, true or false?

In the event of a divorce, the female gender is the presumptive "better parent" and will usually be awarded over 50% of all marital assets, true or false?

Scott Huminski

Nifong is an angel compared to the felony conduct of the prosecutor described in the below Court brief.
-- scott huminski


The comments to this entry are closed.

My Photo

About This Blog

Sui Generis Partner

Other Sui Generis Sponsors

Receive Updates Via Email


  • This site is intended purely as a resource guide for educational and informational purposes and is not intended to provide specific legal advice. This site should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a professional attorney in your state. The use and receipt of the information offered on this site is not intended to create, nor does it create, an attorney-client relationship.

    Please feel free to contact me via e-mail or otherwise. However, please be advised that an attorney-client relationship is not created through the act of sending electronic mail to me.

    The comments on this blog are solely the opinions of the individuals leaving them. In no way does Legal Antics or Nicole L. Black endorse, condone, agree with, sponsor, etc. these comments.

    Further, any information provided on this blog or in the comments should be taken at your own risk.