My Photo

lawtechtalk


About This Blog

Sui Generis Partner

Other Sui Generis Sponsors





Search


  • Google
    Web Sui Generis


  • Legal Search Engine - Law.com Quest

Etc.





  • Save the Net

________________________

« New York Lawyer Advertising--the NYT Weighs In | Main | Third Department Considers Liability of Police Officer Responding to a Call »

March 04, 2007

Define That Term #192

Tuesday's term was cy pres doctrine, which is defined as:

n. (see-pray doctrine) from French, meaning "as close as possible." When a gift is made by will or trust (usually for charitable or educational purposes), and the named recipient of the gift does not exist, has dissolved or no longer conducts the activity for which the gift is made, then the estate or trustee must make the gift to an organization which comes closest to fulfilling the purpose of the gift. Sometimes this results in heated court disputes in which a judge must determine the appropriate substitute to receive the gift. Example: dozens of local Societies for Protection of Cruelty to Animals contested for a gift which was made without designating which chapter would receive the benefits. The judge wisely divided up the money among several S.P.C.A. chapters.

No substantive guesses were offered this time around.

Today's term is:

dram shop rule.

As always, educated guesses are welcome--but no dictionaries, please.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834516c2469e200d8351eb47669e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Define That Term #192:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

The dram shop rule (or act) imposes strict liability upon an entity (can be a business who sells or a social host who gives) alcoholic beverages to a person who appears intox. The strict liability is to anybody harmed by the drunk person. Some states have really extended this liability. For instance Texas laws which prohibit selling booze to minors also impose dram shop liability on the seller for just about any stupid thing the drunk kid does to himself! On the other hand, California law prohibits the imposition of dram shop liability. This doesn't mean the bar can't be sued - it just means the P's lawyer has to prove that the provider of said booze was in fact a cause of the harm.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Criminal Law in New York

My Articles

____________________


  • Faculty @ SPU

  • Blog Awards Winner

  • The 2007 Weblog Awards

Receive Updates Via Email

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Law.com Newswire

disclaimer

  • This site is intended purely as a resource guide for educational and informational purposes and is not intended to provide specific legal advice. This site should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a professional attorney in your state. The use and receipt of the information offered on this site is not intended to create, nor does it create, an attorney-client relationship.

    Please feel free to contact me via e-mail or otherwise. However, please be advised that an attorney-client relationship is not created through the act of sending electronic mail to me.

    The comments on this blog are solely the opinions of the individuals leaving them. In no way does Legal Antics or Nicole L. Black endorse, condone, agree with, sponsor, etc. these comments.

    Further, any information provided on this blog or in the comments should be taken at your own risk.