My Photo

lawtechtalk


About This Blog

Sui Generis Partner

Other Sui Generis Sponsors





Search


  • Google
    Web Sui Generis


  • Legal Search Engine - Law.com Quest

Etc.





  • Save the Net

________________________

« Define That Term #189 | Main | Crimes and Misdemeanors »

February 22, 2007

Prosecutorial Indiscretion

It must have been a slow year for the DA's office in Stafford, Virginia.  At least, that's the only explanation I can come up with for the DA's absolute failure to exercise anything that even resembles discretion in the case of Jessica Hall, a mother of three whose husband is currently serving his third tour of duty in Iraq. 

As reported in this AP article, yesterday Ms. Hall was sentenced to 5 years probation after being convicted of the felony of maliciously throwing a missile into an occupied vehicle. 

In support of his contention that a 2 year prison sentence was an appropriate punishment, the prosecutor stated:

"It is important to remember that it is not what is thrown but the danger created by that act that Virginia law seeks to protect against."

The "victim" of this crime had this to say about the prosecution (from this AP article):

"I think that this is way too much of a punishment for her actions. This is just to me absolutely ridiculous," Fowle said. Community service would have made more sense, she said.

I suppose that by now you're wondering what sort of "missile" that Ms. Hall threw at the "victim".  Good question.  It was a cup of ice.  Yep.  A cup of ice.  From the second article above:

On a hot day in July, Hall was driving north on Interstate 95 with her children and her sister, who was six months pregnant and having early contractions. Traffic had slowed to a crawl, when, she said, another car cut her off twice. Angered, she flung the cup into the other car, where it flew across the driver and landed all over his girlfriend...

Hall, who was driving from North Carolina to New York for a family party, said she was trying to keep up with her father's truck when Ballin cut in front of her the second time, causing her to swerve.

The decision to throw ice into the other vehicle?  Not too smart.  The decision to pursue any criminal conviction--let alone a felony conviction--for her actions?  Absolutely ridiculous.  The value of a prosecutor who, unlike the ADA in this case, actually understands the meaning of "prosecutorial discretion"?  Priceless.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834516c2469e200d83540b8f969e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Prosecutorial Indiscretion:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Criminal Law in New York

My Articles

____________________


  • Faculty @ SPU

  • Blog Awards Winner

  • The 2007 Weblog Awards

Receive Updates Via Email

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Law.com Newswire

disclaimer

  • This site is intended purely as a resource guide for educational and informational purposes and is not intended to provide specific legal advice. This site should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a professional attorney in your state. The use and receipt of the information offered on this site is not intended to create, nor does it create, an attorney-client relationship.

    Please feel free to contact me via e-mail or otherwise. However, please be advised that an attorney-client relationship is not created through the act of sending electronic mail to me.

    The comments on this blog are solely the opinions of the individuals leaving them. In no way does Legal Antics or Nicole L. Black endorse, condone, agree with, sponsor, etc. these comments.

    Further, any information provided on this blog or in the comments should be taken at your own risk.