« Define That Term #51 | Main | Define That Term #52 »

March 01, 2006


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.


"This is not a subjective determination..."

Am I the only one who finds this comment to be a bit odd? Isn't all art subjective? Is it now the case that only those works where the artist has a "general reputation" as an artist in whatever "community" is to be deemed worthy to crate art? Or those where the right "creatrive process" was used? And what exactly is the "relevant artistic community"? If I am an unknown artist struggling to get to the top I'd be troubled by this decision.


I'm with Eddie. Art is art, and all that. But how would you know that art is art for arts sake and not for profit, or some other non-artistic purpose?*

For instance, what if the artist reproduced and the sold the photograph as postcards, calendars, books, etc. for personal profit. Should that have any effect on the Court's reasoning?

*Like the time DJ, my college roommate hung the infamous nude photos of Vanessa Williams all over the walls on his side of the dorm room. Since they were black and white, he called them "art."

Nicole Black

That struck me as strange as well. Seems pretty subjective to me. For instance, the black and white nudes of Vanessa Williams--in my mind--not art.

And, as an aside, what was DJ thinking, wdegraw? I doubt that that "art" was all that popular with the women to whom he actually had access. Not a smooth move for a guy in college, in my opinion.


The idea that profit is inimical to art is bogus.


Hopefully, tomorrow's "Define that Term" word will be inimical, I can figure out whether Slick is with my or agin me.

The comments to this entry are closed.

My Photo

About This Blog

Sui Generis Partner

Receive Updates Via Email


  • This site is intended purely as a resource guide for educational and informational purposes and is not intended to provide specific legal advice. This site should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a professional attorney in your state. The use and receipt of the information offered on this site is not intended to create, nor does it create, an attorney-client relationship.

    Please feel free to contact me via e-mail or otherwise. However, please be advised that an attorney-client relationship is not created through the act of sending electronic mail to me.

    The comments on this blog are solely the opinions of the individuals leaving them. In no way does Legal Antics or Nicole L. Black endorse, condone, agree with, sponsor, etc. these comments.

    Further, any information provided on this blog or in the comments should be taken at your own risk.