My Photo

About This Blog

Sui Generis Partner

Sui Generis Sponsor

Other Sui Generis Sponsors





Search


  • Google
    Web Sui Generis


  • Legal Search Engine - Law.com Quest

Etc.





  • Save the Net

________________________


« No Excuse Required. | Main | New Year, New Format. »

January 02, 2006

New 60 Day Motion Rule in NY

Please see the UPDATE regarding this rule in this post.

The New York Attorney Malpractice Blog notes that the Chief Administrative Judge of New York Courts has established the following new rule:

If 60 days have elapsed after a motion has been finally submitted or oral argument held, whichever is later, an no decision has been issued by the court, counsel for the movant shall send the court a letter alerting it to this fact with copies to all parties to the motion.

I've heard of this new rule from other sources as well, but unfortunately was unable to locate the text of the new rule online. 

Prior to the adoption of this rule, attorneys were required to walk a fine line in order to avoid badgering the judge regarding the status of an overdue decision.   This rule will certainly make that unpleasant task an easier one.

However, I think  that Andrew Lavoot Bluestone at the New York Attorney Malpractice Blog raises a good point when he wonders whether the failure to alert the court in a timely manner could constitute legal malpractice.  Only time will tell.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/616017/3951826

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference New 60 Day Motion Rule in NY:

» New Uniform Rules for the Commercial Division of Supreme Court from New York Civil Law
The Chief Admistrative Judge of New York State issued this press release, providing the new uniform rules of the Commerical Division of the Supreme Court. Of particular note is a 60-rule that requires (using the term shall) to send a [Read More]

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Thanks for the head's up on this rule. Your post helped me uncover that there a bunch of new rules for the Commercial Division of the Supreme Court.

Here are the rules:
http://www.courts.state.ny.us/rules/UniformRulesofCommercialDivision.pdf

Post a comment

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In

Criminal Law in New York

____________________


  • Blog Awards Winner

  • The 2007 Weblog Awards

Receive Updates Via Email

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Recent Comments

Law.com Newswire

disclaimer

  • This site is intended purely as a resource guide for educational and informational purposes and is not intended to provide specific legal advice. This site should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a professional attorney in your state. The use and receipt of the information offered on this site is not intended to create, nor does it create, an attorney-client relationship.

    Please feel free to contact me via e-mail or otherwise. However, please be advised that an attorney-client relationship is not created through the act of sending electronic mail to me.

    The comments on this blog are solely the opinions of the individuals leaving them. In no way does Legal Antics or Nicole L. Black endorse, condone, agree with, sponsor, etc. these comments.

    Further, any information provided on this blog or in the comments should be taken at your own risk.